|
by toorc, Level 6
Last updated at October 2, 2009, 1:10 pm
|
Description: I'm On A Mount (World of Warcraft - I'm On A Boat Parody) www.toorc.com for more info. M: Mature Language & Themes youtube.com/nooglide twitter.com/toorc |
Permalink:
|
|

34 comments
pwnst4r Oct 4, 2009 at 9:51 pm
+0 votes
Though the fragmented English made it extremely difficult to comprehrend, I'm pretty sure that post had nothing to do with the point I blatantly made: You unnecessarily publicized the details of what was obviously a private conversation between the two of you.
Ian Beckman Oct 4, 2009 at 10:44 pm
+0 votes
pwnst4r said
Though the fragmented English made it extremely difficult to comprehrend, I'm pretty sure that post had nothing to do with the point I blatantly made: You unnecessarily publicized the details of what was obviously a private conversation between the two of you.
pwnst4r Oct 4, 2009 at 11:28 pm
+0 votes
It seems you have misinterpreted this statement:
"...ive watched and loved/hated parts of your [ian's] work, (and not just
your wow stuff!), but 5* it for creativity, overall composition of the
piece and most importantly to me, was i entertained."
Toorc does not say or imply that he wanted you to publicize your conversation. In this statement, he is praising your work, not asking you to critique his.
"...ive watched and loved/hated parts of your [ian's] work, (and not just
your wow stuff!), but 5* it for creativity, overall composition of the
piece and most importantly to me, was i entertained."
Toorc does not say or imply that he wanted you to publicize your conversation. In this statement, he is praising your work, not asking you to critique his.
Ian Beckman Oct 5, 2009 at 1:52 pm
+1 votes
pwnst4r said
It seems you have misinterpreted this statement:
"...ive watched and loved/hated parts of your [ian's] work, (and not just
your wow stuff!), but 5* it for creativity, overall composition of the
piece and most importantly to me, was i entertained."
Toorc does not say or imply that he wanted you to publicize your conversation. In this statement, he is praising your work, not asking you to critique his.
"...ive watched and loved/hated parts of your [ian's] work, (and not just
your wow stuff!), but 5* it for creativity, overall composition of the
piece and most importantly to me, was i entertained."
Toorc does not say or imply that he wanted you to publicize your conversation. In this statement, he is praising your work, not asking you to critique his.
"...ive watched and loved/hated parts of your work, (and not just your wow stuff!)"
I love and hate your work.
"but 5* it for creativity, overall composition of the piece and most importantly to me, was i entertained."
But consider my work a score of 5 for creativity and composition. Did it entertain you at least?!!
Or take more than five seconds to send me an angry letter and save us all the headache of breaking down your broken English.
pwnst4r Oct 5, 2009 at 7:33 pm
+1 votes
It has become obvious to me that you are, without a doubt, slow.
I can honestly say I chuckled when I read, "...save us all the headache of breaking down your broken English." I apologize that it's difficult for you to comprehend (or for that matter, write) English above the elementary level, but don't chastise me for your obvious lack of literacy skills. I would invite you to cite this "broken English," but I wouldn't ask you to waste your time looking for something that isn't there.
With that said, let me get back on topic. I will not interpret toorc's statement for you again. It is extremely clear that he did not want you to publicize the converstaion or critique his work publicly. Manipulation of the facts does not make you correct, so you can stop doing so.
Though I'm positive your belligerency will not allow you to do so, I advise you to discontinue your mindless rebuttals.You are wrong and the continuation of this argument will not make you right. I, however, will be the first to say I'm finished with this argument, because I know that I will not have the last word.
-pwnst4r.
I can honestly say I chuckled when I read, "...save us all the headache of breaking down your broken English." I apologize that it's difficult for you to comprehend (or for that matter, write) English above the elementary level, but don't chastise me for your obvious lack of literacy skills. I would invite you to cite this "broken English," but I wouldn't ask you to waste your time looking for something that isn't there.
With that said, let me get back on topic. I will not interpret toorc's statement for you again. It is extremely clear that he did not want you to publicize the converstaion or critique his work publicly. Manipulation of the facts does not make you correct, so you can stop doing so.
Though I'm positive your belligerency will not allow you to do so, I advise you to discontinue your mindless rebuttals.You are wrong and the continuation of this argument will not make you right. I, however, will be the first to say I'm finished with this argument, because I know that I will not have the last word.
-pwnst4r.
Ian Beckman Oct 5, 2009 at 8:58 pm
+2 votes
pwnst4r said
It has become obvious to me that you are, without a doubt, slow.
I can honestly say I chuckled when I read, "...save us all the headache of breaking down your broken English." I apologize that it's difficult for you to comprehend (or for that matter, write) English above the elementary level, but don't chastise me for your obvious lack of literacy skills. I would invite you to cite this "broken English," but I wouldn't ask you to waste your time looking for something that isn't there.
With that said, let me get back on topic. I will not interpret toorc's statement for you again. It is extremely clear that he did not want you to publicize the converstaion or critique his work publicly. Manipulation of the facts does not make you correct, so you can stop doing so.
Though I'm positive your belligerency will not allow you to do so, I advise you to discontinue your mindless rebuttals.You are wrong and the continuation of this argument will not make you right. I, however, will be the first to say I'm finished with this argument, because I know that I will not have the last word.
-pwnst4r.
I can honestly say I chuckled when I read, "...save us all the headache of breaking down your broken English." I apologize that it's difficult for you to comprehend (or for that matter, write) English above the elementary level, but don't chastise me for your obvious lack of literacy skills. I would invite you to cite this "broken English," but I wouldn't ask you to waste your time looking for something that isn't there.
With that said, let me get back on topic. I will not interpret toorc's statement for you again. It is extremely clear that he did not want you to publicize the converstaion or critique his work publicly. Manipulation of the facts does not make you correct, so you can stop doing so.
Though I'm positive your belligerency will not allow you to do so, I advise you to discontinue your mindless rebuttals.You are wrong and the continuation of this argument will not make you right. I, however, will be the first to say I'm finished with this argument, because I know that I will not have the last word.
-pwnst4r.
I just proved to you what was there, dude. I gave you my interpretation. Don't believe what you read from my point of view? Fine. Don't tell me how to interpret it under the pwnst4r command; there is no right answer here. And where is it extremely clear that he didn't want to publicize it? I dare you to prove it. Whatever the case, it negates the fact for reconsideration in the first place, which is extremely clear.
The lesson of the story is this: Don't tell me to redact my statement, reconsider the video, and then cry to me about how you told me that I went as far as reconsidering it in public.
I can tell you one thing toorc, it's kind of unfortunate for you. Because I sat through some of your work and actually kind of liked it. But now knowing your true attitude, there is no way that I will ever be able to respect you in the same way ever again.
Discussion over. Even though it hasn't been a discussion since pwnst4r and toorc began to flame me.
Rat in a Hat Oct 6, 2009 at 11:47 am
+1 votes
Squeek Squeek
Still a good video and good for some laughs, I like the run over dwarf scene. Oi!
Still a good video and good for some laughs, I like the run over dwarf scene. Oi!
Tagjack Oct 6, 2009 at 4:19 pm
+1 votes
so much hating.... took me minutes to read all the comments!!! SHAME ON YOU AND YOUR LONG COMMENTS!!! pffff
now go make somemachinima!
now go make somemachinima!
Ponta Oct 24, 2009 at 8:33 pm
+1 votes
This was good, i really liked it =)
Looking forward for more videos from ya!
Looking forward for more videos from ya!
3 |
Next » |



Your Comment is being posted. Please wait...